.
Feedback

Merrick To Be Arraigned Sept. 8 In Superior Court

With his attorney caught in the travel tie-up caused by Hurricane Irene, arraignment for a Lafayette school teacher is put over until Sept. 8.

Arraignment of Lafayette teacher Michael Merrick was put over until Sept. 8 after his attorney phoned in to report she was caught up in the after effects of Hurricane Irene.

Merrick, 48, was scheduled to be arraigned before Superior Court Judge Brian Haynes Tuesday. But attorney Elizabeth Grossman was apparently among thousands of travelers caught in the air travel tie-up triggered by the weekend storm. She called the court to say she would be unable to make it back to California from the East Coast.

The Stanley Middle School teacher faces 24 felony counts of child molestation and a single misdemeanor charge stemming from his relationship with a 14-year-old student he was tutoring.

Prosecutors allege that Merrick forced a sexual relationship upon the girl, "grooming" her for sexual advances she told police he made during tutoring sessions in his office.

Investigators found that the teacher texted the girl - once more than 100 times in a single day - and sent her inappropriate photos of himself before he was arrested last October.

Newsletter & Alerts

Get the best stories each day and important breaking news

Subscribe

Not from Lamorinda Patch? Find your Local Patch »

Jim Fleming August 31, 2011 at 10:11 pm
Did this disgusting stuff always go on and nobody bothered to report it or are we caught in some modern XXXX storm of exploitation? And how do we go about making it stop?
Eastofthehills September 1, 2011 at 02:39 am
so are we going to see a plea...
J.D. O'Connor (Editor) September 1, 2011 at 11:11 am
Note to RFL -
Good morning. I deleted your post for two reasons, primarily because of your presumption of guilt and secondarily because your post was anonymous. An opinion of someone's guilt would be just that, your opinion, but only if your name were attached. Anonymous accusation leaves a bitter taste. Thanks, Editor
Chris Nicholson September 1, 2011 at 11:16 am
Interesting questions. I don't think that human nature has changed much in recent millennia, so I suspect that this sort of thing has been happening ever since Socrates ogled his servant boys-- if not longer. I think there are more fluctuations in reporting (and in what society and the law deem criminal versus merely gross) than in behavior.
I think the only way to "make it stop" is to catch and lock up the offenders, as seems to be happening here.
Chris Nicholson September 1, 2011 at 11:27 am
@JD: I get your policy re: anonymity, but the "presumption" of innocence is rebuttable. I don't put much weight is the fact of an arrest or accusation--- or even suspicious circumstances. But, once the picture starts to come into focus, we can begin to assess the merits. Based on the (admittedly incomplete) facts and circumstances that we now know, I think it is more likely than not that he is guilty of the core underlying bad behavior here. This is not a "presumption of guilt" and it is not proof beyond a reasonable doubt, it is a (preliminary) assessment of reality. Frankly, I don't see how any reasonable and objective person could not come to the same (caveated) conclusion.
I think it's a bit too slavish an adherence to the "Presumption of Innocence" concept to deny that which is now staring us in the face.....
J.D. O'Connor (Editor) September 1, 2011 at 11:42 am
Well, good morning, Chris!
I hear you, believe me. But the anonymous posts of "he is guilty" take on a weight of their own and I would prefer that if they are to be made the person making the assertion identify themselves. "RFL" actually made some great points in support of his/her stance, I would just be more comfortable with a name behind the position. That is all... Coffee again, soon? JD
rr September 1, 2011 at 02:44 pm
In response to the questions by Jim - I think the bottom line is that our society is rapidly changing to needing immediate gratification and don't stop and think before they act. Inappropriate molestations have probably been going on forever - people that have power over others sometimes take advantage. However, I think the change has been that people now are not afraid to report it and realize that the victim isn't the one that is guilty or did anything wrong, it’s the perpetrator.
Shannon W. September 1, 2011 at 04:45 pm
Also in response to Jim - sadly, this sort of grossness is legal and/or tolerated in many places in the world today, where you can find 14 year old girls (and younger) married off to middle aged men, and was tolerated in our American and the European culture in the past as well, when child brides and arranged marriages were more common. Now, it's criminal.
Shannon W. September 1, 2011 at 04:52 pm
My children read a book in the "Dear America" series about a 13 year old immigrant Polish girl who married a widower with 3 children in the late 1890s, and was herself a widow at age 14, with 3 stepchildren not much younger than herself. This particular book is fiction, but those sorts of things probably did happen. It seems horrible to us today.
Shannon W. September 1, 2011 at 06:13 pm
In other cultural weirdness, I just remembered an early 90s Argentine telenovela called Princesa, which was about a high school girl's romance with her high school history teacher, who was played by the ever-so-handsome Gabriel Corrado (age 32 at the time). Perhaps the high school girl was 18, but it still struck me as exceedingly weird and creepy that Argentine TV was passing off this high school student-teacher relationship as "o.k." (I was watching this to improve my Spanish - and for cultural studies as well - lol.)
Chris Nicholson September 1, 2011 at 06:24 pm
Shannon: This reminds me of a fictional story from India (written in the 18th century) about a fading semi-famous actor in his 50s and a wannabe actress who was only 16 deciding that it would be mutually beneficial to wed. In spite of (or perhaps due to) the predictable public outrage, they, ahem, consummated the plan. All perfectly legal, apparently.
Oh wait. That wasn't fiction. And it was in the U.S. And it happened this year: http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2011/08/16/courtney-stodden-pamerla-anderson_n_927961.html
lovelafayette September 2, 2011 at 11:45 am
Merrick’s own attorney (quoted in the Contra Costa Times) proclaimed the man guilty when she offered as his defense, “a consensual relationship.” Blaming the child victim is despicable, and compounds his crimes. Perhaps the media, including Patch, will now stop referring to him as a “Lafayette teacher.” The reference to the “consensual relationship” transformed him from a teacher into an admitted pedophile, who resides in jail somewhere. Chris pointed out pedophilia is as old as time, but technology facilitates it in new ways. Computers and cell phones invite the entire world into our homes, and into our children’s lives. Parents, caring adults and institutions face new challenges keeping children safe. How to protect them against persons they need to trust, like teachers, coaches, therapists, relatives and the clergy remains a real challenge.
Miles VanBuren September 2, 2011 at 11:06 pm
JD-So you would feel more comfortable with an accusation coming from someone who uses a screen name like RR or Eastofthehills as commented in this story? Are they not also anonymous? I actually have more respect for someone who is sincere enough to remain anonymous rather than hide behind a screen name that tells us no more than anonymous. Am I missing more here? I do respect your editing rights but deleting a comment because they chose not to disclose their actual real name seems a tad over the top.
J.D. O'Connor (Editor) September 2, 2011 at 11:20 pm
Note to Miles:
A true name, Miles, rather than a screen name. And for the reasons stated.
Lafayette Curmudgeon September 3, 2011 at 01:19 am
Seriously, J.D., either *ban* pseudonyms, or treat those who post under them as regular citizens. I'm guessing you'll get less participation with such a policy, but at least folks would know whether they could participate or not.
I think the right rule is that folks should have a registered account and use only a single name -- to avoid the whole Mary Rosh stuff -- but if you want transparency, then demand it universally and see what happens to your user base.
Johnny September 9, 2011 at 12:50 pm
Any update on this?
J.D. O'Connor (Editor) September 9, 2011 at 12:54 pm
Mr. Merrick's case was put over again until later this month.
du Motier September 9, 2011 at 03:58 pm
From the beginning, The Patch had been the place to go for coverage of this story. Since around June, though, it feels as if it's only being covered reluctantly, with updates provided only when asked. Even then, the replies are terse and incomplete. What, for example, was the stated reason for putting the case over, and when is the next court date? I'm sure the judge didn't just leave things at "later this month".
Peter Seperack September 9, 2011 at 06:15 pm
I too am interested in any information the Patch can provide. Were all attorneys present? Was it open to the public? Why was it put over? Next date for a court appearance?
BV September 9, 2011 at 06:40 pm
Yes it has been very obvious that Patch has backed off this coverage.
J.D. O'Connor (Editor) September 9, 2011 at 06:41 pm
Peter and du M -
Thanks for your kind words and for reading us. I am aware interest in this case is high, though we have been scolded for following it too closely. We are attempting a balancing act, as court coverage outside our given area does tax our staffing (we're looking for one, solid reporter to help with the news flow by the way). Thursday's appearance before Judge Haynes was brief, with the prosecutor on hand and other counsel appearing for Mr. Merrick's attorney, Elizabeth Grossman. Arraignment put over until Sept. 22. Beyond that, we had little to pass on and other stories to write, so pardon our terseness. Thanks for your continued interest and communication. Editor
J.D. O'Connor (Editor) September 9, 2011 at 06:48 pm
BV -
Allow me a bit of Irish testiness - but what a ridiculous statement to make. We're either too aggressive or not aggressive enough for some people, it seems. That comes with the territory. We remain committed to covering this and many other stories underway in our area - as you can see by reading the stories we put up every day. If you happen to know of a good, solid reporter with crackerjack writing and reporting skills, please send me their name as we're hiring - and we need another body to keep pace with all that's going on. Thanks, Editor
Note Article
Just a short thought to get the word out quickly about anything in your neighborhood.
Share something with your neighbors. Write a new post... What's up? Make an announcement, speak your mind, or sell something
Contra Costa Veterinary Hospital June 7, 2013 at 09:06 am
Woohoo!!! Congratulations to all the adopted pets, families with new pets and the rescues for comingRead More together for such a great cause :)
Laura June 7, 2013 at 10:49 am
Fantastic. I watched a gorgeous orange tabby get selected by a couple when I was buying cat food.Read More Made my day. Way to go CC4C and Pet Food Express.
greg w June 6, 2013 at 04:01 pm
Two of them - one high, one low...guessing burglars or mountain lion
eruc June 6, 2013 at 05:32 pm
KCBS reports missing 23 year old missing man. Vague report but citizens are asked to call police ifRead More seen.
eruc June 6, 2013 at 05:35 pm
More about this...Read More http://www.mercurynews.com/top-stories/ci_23406312/lafayette-police-searching-missing-at-risk-adult