patching...
Welcome back, Patch Blogger!

Seismic Retrofitting Costs, Batting Cages and Parcel Tax Activity at Moraga School District Board Meeting

The Moraga School Board met on Tuesday evening in an unusually long meeting to attend to regular business, as well as hear of costly earthquake retrofitting, parcel tax potential and community interest in batting cages at Joaquin Moraga.

 

Bruce Burns, superintendent, opened the Moraga school district board meeting on Tuesday night noting that the schools were featured in a Forbes.com article highlighting Moraga’s educational value for real estate dollars. He updated the board on the success of Moraga students in the Parent Teacher Assocation’s annual Reflections campaign, with students receiving recognition for video, music and written compositions.

Kym Leserman gave an update to the board about the bus services contracted by the district. Fees will go up about three percent a year. The bus service will use a texting system to notify parents or sitters if buses are late; however, only one bus in Moraga has been late in the recent past.

Joanne McClellan, president of the Moraga Teachers’ Association, wanted to extend her thanks to Bruce Burns for being great to work with in the absence of a formal appreciation day for school district staff.

Sara Mooradian, a parent at Los Perales, highlighted an upcoming community event taking place on May 24 at Lafayette Plaza Park from 7 to 8 a.m. Called “Wake Up California” this event is meant to educate the public, bring the community together and generate press interest in the ongoing budget issues impacting children in the state. 

The board passed proclamations honoring Gayle Lombardi, Carol Scott and Kim Gelman, all of whom are retiring from the district this year.

California School Employees Association Week is May 15 through 21. This week is dedicated to honoring staff at the schools who are often behind-the-scenes and keep the schools running smoothly.

With regret, the board approved the termination of positions dedicated to physical education and child behavior specialist. The positions have been eliminated to help balance the budget.

Dr. Brad Senden from the Center for Community Opinion presented an analysis of 401 telephone interviews to gauge community support. The net result is that there is “a solid base of support” of about 60 percent of voters for a parcel tax in support of the schools, but no one issue creates a super-majority required for passage of a tax.

The results suggest that the district “needs time to talk in detail to the 10 to 15 percent who don’t know. Answer their questions. You need to make the core of an argument for the monies requested.”

The board queried Senden regarding the need for a sunset clause on the potential parcel tax. Senden stated that it was no longer part of the polling process as response is strong every time for a sunset date.

In addition, the board requested guidance on whether to pursue a mail-in or regular vote. Senden stated that the mail-in process is cheaper for the district and that crowded ballots are often counterproductive to passage as the ballot measure gets lost among the other issues.

After further discussion, and after clarifying that any ballot measure passed would not impact taxes until July 1, 2012, the board directed Burns to pursue the potential for an April or May parcel tax.

Seismic upgrades then became the focus point of the meeting. Ron Gallagher, of R.P. Gallagher and Associates, a structural engineering firm, and John Nelson, of Murakami/Nelson Architectural Corporation, presented their findings on the Camino Pablo large classroom building and Wings 2 and 3 at Rheem Elementary.

These buildings all require seismic strengthening. Their construction – tilt-up walls – are prone to breaking away from the roof during a major quake. While the engineering firm does not anticipate that the roof would fall in on the buildings, a major quake would very likely make the buildings uninhabitable and unusable for the district.

Major costs are involved, as the walls must be braced to the roof, requiring that the roof be removed. At Rheem, the interior walls of these two wings also need to connected to the foundation. This would impact lighting, HVAC, electrical, and any other wiring or system that currently runs in the ceiling space – called “soft costs.” Because of the cost of the project, ADA requirements must also be met, requiring changes to sinks and doorways, impacting plumbing and flooring.

The engineers estimate that construction would cost about $4.2 million dollars. Broken out:

Camino Pablo

$1,688,000

Rheem Wing 2

437,000

Rheem Wing 3

942,000

Total Construction Costs

3,067,000

Soft Costs

1,112,000

Final Total

$4,179,000

This number does not include rental of temporary classroom units so that the schools could continue to operate during the construction period, which would take about 10 months. 

The board queried the engineering team about monies available. While public funds from the state are available, they are quickly being used up. Replenishment of the funds given the state’s budget situation is unlikely at this time. In addition, any state funds typically require that the district provide matching funds.

The engineers stated that a retrofit project needs to be more than 50 percent soft costs for it to be cost-efficient to focus on scrapping the existing structure and build a new building that meets current safety standards.

In other money news, Kathy Bell, Chief Business Officer, updated the board on new accounting standards, requiring a change in reporting processes. She walked the board through the new categories.

Matt Westphal, of the Moraga Baseball Association, requested permission to build batting cages on the far west, unused portion of the Joaquin Moraga fields over the summer.

Lloyd Suganama and Bianca Lin, who live near the school, complained about noise and traffic. Westphal stated that batting cage use would occur during regular practice, not in addition to practice time.

In addition, Westphal stated that batting practice occurs now during practice time -- the batting cages are being requested to make it safer for the players and coaches by designating a specific location for batting practice.

Suganama and Lin both complained of late notice, having received the notice only the day before. Administrative staff spoke up, stating they had hand-delivered notices on Monday to increase attendance as in 2005, when the issue was last brought before the board, more advance notice meant that no one attended.

Tom Fitzgerald supported the projected and stated he moved close to Joaquin Moraga to be involved in sports and activities held on the school grounds. He noted that the cars and activity around Joaquin Moraga speak to “a vibrant community.”

The board extended the meeting 10 minutes to allow for discussion of reorganization of the after-school childcare clubs. The goal is to move to one director for all three sites. Next year, with the retirement of one director, two directors will oversee three sites.

About this column: The latest news and information from area teachers, district officials and the students who make Lamorinda's schools among the best in the state.
Did you attend the meeting? Tell us in the comments.

Sara

9:06 am on Friday, May 13, 2011

As someone who has lived near and moved away from batting cages set up by an unthinking city agency I would tell residents living in the impacted area to get ready for this: ping, ping, ping, ping, ping - for hours on end.

Metal bats on balls give off a distinctive sound. You better like it, a lot, to live near it.

Reply

Tony Rodriguez

9:46 am on Friday, May 13, 2011

I don't think we're talking about a bank of batting cages with lights and pitching machines, but instead about two fenced/netted rectangles, in which the same type (volume and time of day) of bat to (hand-pitched) ball contact will occur as has been occurring for years.

Reply

Chris Nicholson

9:48 am on Friday, May 13, 2011

There is something deeply unsettling about School Boards hiring firms like the "Center for Community Opinion" in connection with Parcel Taxes. These outfits are not seeking "public opinion," in any democratic or policy-oriented sense. They are purely and unabashedly political polsters testing various permutations of messaging/spin/demographic profiling and targeting/etc.--- not in an effort to find out what average citizens want, but rather what words, phrases and tactics will deliver the results sought (a new or extended tax). This is pure marketing-- paid for by the taxpayers-- often aimed at subverting, not revealing, the will of average voters.

Doesn't feel or smell good to me.

Reply
Comment_arrow

Tony Rodriguez

1:42 pm on Friday, May 13, 2011

I don't think I join in the "subverting" comment. Don't forget the cost (though I rather doubt you did!). My media people tell me I wrote this back in February:

I think these consultants have done a good job at marketing themselves and their formula, but the whole thing, especially in light of the well-known facts about donations and parcel tax votes in this school district and neighboring districts, seems like we're paying $30K to someone who has promised to bring back the sun tomorrow morning. There hasn't been a poll since 1998, but there have been parcel tax (elementary and high school) votes, and years of increasing contributions to PTA and MEF.
Prediction: 55 to 60 percent of those surveyed will say they favor a parcel tax of $150 to $175 if that is what it takes to preserve small class sizes, restore or preserve music, aides, technology programs, and the funds are monitored by a citizen's committee, with a senior's exemption.

5/13/11 note: Notwithstanding the above, I'd like to pre-order my "Yes on __" lawn sign.

Comment_arrow

Chris Nicholson

2:23 pm on Friday, May 13, 2011

"subvert |səbˈvərt|
verb [ trans. ]
undermine the power and authority of (an established system or institution) : an attempt to subvert democratic government."

To the extent that our system of democracy is based on the input and participation of the governed (kind of a tautology I think) , you'd think that a proposal to transfer wealth from Givers (non school parents) to Getters (parents) would be best evaluated in a forum with a balanced cross section of the populace. For example, a regular election cycle-- ideally a presidential election (when turnout is typically highest and no special interest group is motivated to vote or stay home). Knowing this, and knowing that a Parcel Tax generally does worse and worse with higher turn out, all consultants will tell your (as a "freebie" bit of common sense), that to win a Parcel Tax you need to keep turnout low amongst the general population, but high amongst the "Getters." I would love it if someone would deny this.

Knowingly manipulating the system to achieve a low-turnout result that is NOT a fair proxy for the overall will of the electorate is a subversion, no? When the issue is "should we feed the beast?," doesn't it seem weird that the beast gets to set the rules?

Maybe "distort" or "manipulate" is a better word, but hopefully people will see the point. The deck is stacked.

Comment_arrow

Tony Rodriguez

2:34 pm on Friday, May 13, 2011

I'll stack my anti-parcel tax consultant credentials against anyone's. I agree that we all know why mail-in special elections are favored.
Just to keep your Friday Patching going:
The Electoral College is anti-democratic. Discuss.

Over and out on this one.

natalie johns

12:23 pm on Friday, May 13, 2011

It comes in stages, as we've seen at several local sports venues. First its the improvement to help better "the kids' game experience," then come the lights to "increase efficient use of the venue" and make it available for nighttime play, then it's the outdoor sound system to "enhance the player experience" and to "make the venue a more professional draw."

Great, if we'd wanted mini-coliseums all over town we would have asked for them. The only one benefitting here are *maybe* the kids (we never needed underwater sound systems to swim) and the people selling the tickets.

Reply

Tony Rodriguez

12:55 pm on Friday, May 13, 2011

Holy cow! If you haven't taken a look at the JM baseball fields, I can assure you they are far, far, far on the opposite end of the spectrum from mini-coliseums, and that, were it to occur, history suggests that the progression you describe would be complete circa 2200 A.D.
There are no tickets sold to MBA games. If MBA, the district, or the town ever had the dough and inclination to convert the JM fields into what you describe, the biggest annoyance would be from the flying pigs crashing into the lights. On the other hand, whoever has the ice skating concession in Hell would do pretty well.
Don't hate on two little netted/fenced enclosures.

Reply
Comment_arrow

natalie johns

1:08 pm on Friday, May 13, 2011

That's the way it has happened elsewhere in town. And it is not the most comfortable living arrangement for people who happened to live within earshot. And I think it is clear the town is committed to this new "vibrancy" trend, which as another gentleman pointed out in the story means more traffic and more noise. Just saying.

Tony Rodriguez

1:53 pm on Friday, May 13, 2011

Understood, but I think these two particular "cages" aren't a material (if any) addition to vibrancy, traffic, or noise, and pose a near-zero risk of being the catalyst for the things you cited. Kids who were going to be at practice anyway will be the ones using them.

Reply
Comment_arrow

natalie johns

2:41 pm on Friday, May 13, 2011

I do hope so and appreciate the way you made your point. Perhaps I paint with a broad brush, but I do believe there is an unsettling trend underway and local government seems to have signed off on it.

Carol Ann Long

1:56 pm on Saturday, May 14, 2011

Underwater sound systems? Really??

Reply

BostonBlackie

10:48 am on Sunday, May 15, 2011

I know the batting cages are a hot topic but I am interested is where the district is going to come up with the estimated 4 million plus to retro fit the class rooms!

Reply

Steve Brown

12:17 am on Thursday, June 23, 2011

I guess people should know that: Ultimately, settle on the timings for sport. If the indoor batting cage is set up inside of the household periphery, a single preferences to make your mind up on time as you without doubt will not want young people jogging here and there all the time. But, if the batting cage is made on other well-known platforms, then the full group should contribute in the direction of choosing the time and other facts. http://www.sluggersdugout.com/Batting-Cages-c1.html

Reply

Leave a comment